Anthony and Cleopatra

Ashland, Oregon
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival


Anthony and Cleopatra

by William Shakespeare

Anthony and Cleopatra at their height

Derrick Lee Weeden and Miriam Laube. Photo by the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

By far the best aspect of Oregon Shakespeare Festival’s 2015 production of Anthony and Cleopatra is the set. Scenic designer Richard Hay creates a clean, beautiful, symbol-filled space for the Shakespeare tragedy.  The golden-royal triangles reprised in various forms work as ships, pyramids, and boundaries.  The triangles are bold and colorful, and vivid Egyptian-themed props enhance the feel of empire and luxury. Hay does a great job.

He skillfully keeps the physical on-stage material to a minimum.  He needed to because any actual scenery would be chewed to saw-dust by the manically overheated actors.

Good Lord!  What a complete lack of restraint, scene editing, and scene selection.  What a void of storytelling. What an uncomfortable mess.

Director Bill Rauch serves up an unfocused Anthony and Cleopatra.  There is no evidence of artistic decision making that could guide the audience through Shakespeare’s admittedly overfull story.

But, it isn’t just the failure to define a reason for this production that makes the evening tiring.  Rauch interjects truly wrong, slapstick overacting at dramatic moments. Important scenes are littered with Marx Brothers low-brow comedy. I kept thinking, “Are we supposed to laugh at that? Now?” 

When poor Brent Hinckley (Clown) walks into Cleopatra’s chamber to deliver the poisonous asp that will kill her, he’s made to hum, “The worm goes in, the worm goes out.” Shakespeare may have written the scene with humor, but a director with a concept would have either cut the jokiness or made the character serve as a telling counterpoint to the tragedies befalling the main characters.  In this production the effect is simply jarring.

As in most truly bad theater experiences, it is unfair to fault particular actors for the director’s sins, but prospective audiences need to be cautioned! Normally excellent performers Miriam Laube (Cleopatra) and Derrick Lee Weeden (Anthony) rule their empire with the subtlety and regalness of Charo and Donald Trump. I suspect they were cast for their volcanic emotive ability and ordered to pour it on. Unfortunately, there is no payoff for the audience for the lead characters’ histrionics.

Raffi Barsoumian (Caesar) is allowed to be a cool, dignified contrast to the hot blooded lovers.  He is a welcome presence on stage, but still cannot drain the swamp of emotion and confusion of too many small scenes, too many stories, and too many characters that Rauch sprays from the Shakespeare reservoir.

On the other hand, Costume Designer David C. Woolard only adds to the visual confusion. His clothes are mostly ugly and inappropriate.  Cleopatra too often wears lounge singer dresses.  Sometimes they’re plastic looking, sometimes they’re just trying to reveal too much.  She’s made up slutty, not sexy. A notably bad choice of a round cap for an Asian actor makes him look right out of China when something more careful would have kept him in Egypt.  And, then toward the end of the play soldiers in Alexander’s army start tying Good-Will-purchased, ratty red scarves tied around their necks or arms.  They haven’t fought yet, so the red is not blood. Is it? What is it supposed to signify and why are they wearing it?

There is also an annoying electronic sign that displays inconsistently at the start of a scene. The sign gives the location of the action such as “Alexandria” or “Rome”.  The information is unnecessary, especially the third or fourth time we return to the same set.  Instead of helping me, I got distracted with its unpredictable wording.  Sometime we were told that we were in “Athens, Greece” and another time we were merely in “Athens”. I spaced out wondering if this Athens was in Georgia or exactly where were we?

And, the hair styling!  The Caesar loyalists with their Caesar cuts are a bit obvious but inoffensive.  It’s the Egyptian pageboy dos that cry out for mercy.  I already used “ratty” to describe costume parts, so how about “rats-nest-like” hair? Uneven, fly-away, and badly done.

Occasionally the stage is gorgeous.  The set is lit richly and peopled with actors in full, colorful robes.  Even if the robes don’t make sense and look oddly proportioned, the moment is beautiful.  Those seconds are the highlights of this turn-back-your-ticket bad Anthony and Cleopatra. 

Ozdachs Rating:
Ozdachs Rating: 2 Syntaxes out of 5

 

By |2015-08-23T16:00:53-07:00August 23, 2015|osf, plays|0 Comments

The Count of Monte Cristo

Ashland, Oregon
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

The Count of Monte Cristo
by Alexandre Dumas

Sword fight between Raffi Barsoumian and Al Espinosa

Raffi Barsoumian (Danglars) and Al Espinosa (Dantes). Photo by Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Who knew that a revenge melodrama could be so much fun?

Oregon Shakespeare Festival presents a sharp, finely timed, excellently acted, satisfying evening of a classic payback story written as a book by Alexandre Dumas in 1844 and adapted for the stage as early as 1848.

The version of the play OSF picked to perform is meaningful.  This Count stems from an adaption by Charles Fletcher in 1868. The play was further adapted by James O’Neill who bought the rights to produce the play and made a career taking The Count of Monte Cristo from town to town.  James was also the father of Eugene O’Neill whose Long Day’s Journey Into Night is running contemporaneously in repertory in Ashland.  That play’s father character’s professional career mimicked that of O’Neill’s real-life father, and the dialogue includes references to the actor’s one-hit legacy.  OSF’s decision to stage the father’s star vehicle and the son’s classic family tragedy side by side is a neat bit of play picking.

James O’Neill’s Count transformed Dumas’ adventure novel into a more vengeful, emotional piece. Not everyone, including about 1/3 of the OSF audience, likes that direction.  O’Neill’s approach was historically derided the December 31, 1887 San Francisco Evening Post News Letter:

In his hands the romantic story Monte Cristo has degenerated into an extravagant melodrama. The romance that amused and interested the intellectual world has become a bit of coarse theatricalism, that pleases only the more ignorant of theatre-goers. (source)

Fortunately for me, I am in the 2/3 of people who loved the over-the-stop script.

The melodrama genre demands virtuous heroes, stinky villains, complicated twists and turns, and a happy ending.  The production, directed seamlessly by Marcela Lorca, delivers all of these in style.

The character’s asides to the audience and broad actions could easily become overacted, unintentional comedy.  In this Count, the pieces instead work together in the framework of the melodrama.  There is an inevitability in much of the final moments of the play.  The audience knows the bad guys are going to get it.  But, it is a satisfying inevitably that fits the structure of the storytelling.

Al Espinosa is strong as Edmond Dantes, aka: the Count.  He’s open-faced, clear and believable in his purity.

Indeed, each person on stage is brimming with the characteristic intended: Peter Frechette (the prosecutor) is weakness incarnate, Raffi Barsoumian (Danglars) is greedy treachery personified, and Vilma Silva (Edmond’s fiancee Mercedes) is the picture of honest love. The script may make the characters one dimensional, but the actors fill the stage with the differing personalities and together the cast makes a artistic collage of people.

Richard Elmore (Caderousse the innkeeper) is becoming a reliable, unintentional scene stealer with his perfect character reads and understated —  appropriately stated —  actions. There are a couple of small Elmore gem moments in the Count which deserve a call out of special appreciation.

Another special thanks to fight director Christopher DuVal.  The duels were fun and crisp. We wanted more.

Oregon’s Shakespeare Festival delivered an energetic, accurate, and enjoyable The Count of Monte Cristo.  This production is as good a production of the James O’Neill’s adaption of Dumas classic as you’re ever going to see.  My advice to the people who were put off by the evening’s style: buy another ticket to Long Day’s Journey into Night and boo and hiss when dad comes on stage.

Ozdachs Rating: 4 1/2 Syntaxes out of 5

By |2015-08-23T12:15:12-07:00August 22, 2015|osf, plays|0 Comments

Sweat

Ashland, Oregon
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Sweat
by Lynn Nottage | World Premiere

Jack Willis, Carlo Alban, and K.T. Vogt in "Sweat".

Jack Willis, Carlo Alban, and K.T. Vogt in “Sweat”.
photo by the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Sweat is Lynn Nottage’s brilliant story of people and community in collapse. Before writing this commissioned American Revolutions series play, Nottage talked to residents of America’s poorest city of 2001, Reading, Pennsylvania.  Her work shares the residents’ pain, losses, and self-immolation as their good jobs are eliminated in relentless, financially logical, corporate-mandated factory closings and union busting.

I knew the story’s outline coming into the theater. I expected satisfying liberal ranting and raving at the evils of unchecked capitalism.  I anticipated heroic, self-sacrificing union people rallying together, and I imaged an uplifting ending engendered by a character or two’s meaningful transformation from floor machinist to educated professional. Or, some other dramatically reasonable redemption that would further Nottage’s growing reputation.

Fortunately, Nottage did not write Sweat with my limited vision.  Instead, her approach, plot, and words are extraordinary masterpieces.  Her exposition is unconventional, unexpected, and completely involving.

The play’s action occurs in 2008 and in a series of scenes in 2000. We start out seeing key players in 2008, and then Nottage takes us on a chunk-by-chunk visit to the days in 2000 that led to the creation of the 2008 characters.  We wind up in modern day (2008) and with the same group of locals from the 2000 neighborhood bar.

The 2000 disruption, drama, and dissolution had been excellently crafted and spectacularly well executed onstage in front of us. The drawing of the characters, the choice of illustrative scenes, and the depth of the language of the eight-year-old scenes were alone striking enough to make Sweat a classic.

Yet, the depth of the individual and collective destruction becomes gasp-inducingly crushing when the audience and characters return to 2008.  We understood previously that unpleasant things were happening to our people.  But, the time-spaced moments at the play’s conclusion go beyond our earlier intellectual understanding of tragedy and force us to witness and feel the wreckage of minds, souls, and bodies.

Trying more to describe the power Sweat’s writing would be foolish.  I’d be in danger of substituting my language for Nottage’s.  It just needs to be said that Sweat  is an amazing piece of theater based solely on the vivid story and writing.

Then, after giving full credit to the experience to Nottage, we need to add superlative positive descriptions for every other professional contributor of the OSF.  Really.

Every actor owned their role.  There were no moments when I second guessed the tone or action of any of the people on stage.

The length of my applause for each actor pretty much follows the number of lines they were given to say. Certainly Jack Willis (bartender Stan) had a perfect read on his part from beginning to the very end. Ashland newcomer Tramell Tillman (Chris) used both facial expressions and body movement exceptionally well to accompany his otherwise flawless acting.  Of course, any mention of well controlled movement coupled with devastating line delivery needs to lead to a shout out to Terri McMahon. Her drinking buddies Kimberly Scott (Cynthia) and  K.T. Vogt (Jessie) also had their own focus-riveting moments, and those women’s work was impeccable.

But, now I want to reorder the positive comments because it’s not fair to leave Carlo Alban (Oscar) until now.  He gave a spot-on performance of a role with a lot of onstage downtime coupled with a few critical scenes.  And, Tyrone Wilson (Evan)’s probation officer sets up key moments with mouthfuls of exposition.  Wilson is skilled getting things said with real and appropriate humanness.

Which unfairly leaves Kevin Kenerly (Brucie) to last. (Please shuffle the order of actor kudos!) Brucie in word and presence is a Cassandra-like warning for the other regulars in the bar. Yet, Kenerly’s straight-forward, strong but low-key portrayal leaves the audience responsible for connecting the dots.

Better than excellent acting, all.

Then there’s the set. Innovative, effective, and richly done. Scenic designer John Lee Beatty created a canvass that let the action move smoothly and quickly and effectively. The scenery, props, and videos (by Jeff Sugg) worked together with comfort and clarity.

With so many facets of Sweat being flat-out wonderful/meaningful/affecting clearly thanks and credit are due to another Ashland newcomer, director Kate Whoriskey.  All aspects of the evening are in sync.  Whoriskey was part of the Nottage team that worked on the ground in Reading (if I read the Playbill correctly), and her resulting artistic choices made a memorable theatrical event.

This world premier feels like a shaken-out classic.  The minor flaws I noticed are not worth mentioning.  I am grateful to Oregon Shakespeare festival for their ambitious commissions, to Lynn Nottage for her story, and to the cast and crafts for their artistry.

5 Syntaxes out of 5

By |2015-08-27T07:57:54-07:00August 19, 2015|osf, plays|0 Comments

The Best Season Opening

Oregon Shakespeare Festival’s season opening this past weekend showcased four excellent productions.  It was the strongest festival start that I — and my more experienced Ashland friends — have experienced.

Bravo!

I hope to write full reviews of each performance.  But, here are my snap judgements, listing the four plays in my overall order of enjoyment.

Fingersmith
by Alexa Junge based on the novel by Sarah Waters
Syntax says: Ozdachs Rating: 5 out of 5 Syntaxes

Fingersmith

photo by Oregon Shakespeare Festival

This world premiere commissioned by the festival is full of “Wow” plot twists delivered with exquisite attention to language and the style of the times (1861).  The acting, set, crafts, … everything works.  The performance is in three acts that take a full three hours. Yet the whole audience wished there were more acts .

The show blurb says Fingersmith Victorian crime thriller. And, you do feel like you’ve indulged in a guilty pleasure because the experience is so fun.  But, on reflection, there was a lot of social commentary and revelation concealed by the enjoyable tight plotline.

I am waitlisted to see the performance again when we go back in late April.  This play runs in the spring only, and apparently tickets are going to be snapped up… so book or get on the waitlist yourself now.

Much Ado About Nothing
by William Shakespeare
Syntax says:Ozdachs Rating: 4 1/2 Syntaxes out of 5

Seeing a bad Much Ado with a terrible Dogberry was the trigger event in our decision to stop subscribing to Berkeley Repertory Theater 15 or so years ago. So, I usually avoid seeing this play, and bought tickets only because it was the opening play of opening weekend. This production may get me to reverse my defacto dred!

The director, Lileana Blain-Cruz, brought a clean, innovative vision that reminded me of Bill Rauch with his surprising and interesting takes on plays I think I don’t want to see again.  The story was clear, characters consistently motivated, and the actors had chemistry and energy.  And, Rex Young’s Dogberry on a Segway is not to be missed!

Pericles
by William Shakespeare
Syntax says: Ozdachs Rating: 4 Syntaxes out of 5

The acting is spectacular! Wayne Carr (Pericles) is a standout, and there is no one onstage who is less than excellent.  Again, the story is presented easily and powerfully.  As soap-opera-y as the narrative is, we got sucked in and most of us were teary-eyed at the revelatory moments.

Unfortunately, some tech choices brought me out of the moment and into the mode of being a critic. The costumes, hair, and make-up were God-awful to the point of farce and also inconsistent.  Ugly and sackcloth-like when the character is royalty. Why?

And, this production will be remembered as Pericles the Musical.  There’s way too many sudden outbursts of singing, and it feels unnatural and distracting.  Act II starts with a song that is particularly out of place.

Guys and Dolls
Based on a story by Damon Runyon | Music and Lyrics by Frank Loesser | Book by Jo Swerling and Abe Burrows
Syntax says: NO RATING

This is the first musical in Ashland that triggered my “I don’t like musicals” reaction.  I just felt the evening was fluff.

But, I recognize that the entire production was extremely well done fluff.  The singing, the dancing, the acting, the staging, the everything… was world class.  I think OSF has done a terrific job of delivering the best of this classical musical.  It just did not do it for me.

I recommend that if you like Guys and Dolls, or other musicals in that style, that you snap up a ticket.  It’s a 5-star musical evening.  On the other hand, my personal star meter barely twitched.

By |2015-03-06T13:53:26-08:00March 4, 2015|osf, plays|0 Comments

Family Album

Ashland, Oregon
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival
Family Album cast

OSF photo by Jenny Graham

Family Album
Book & lyrics by Stew | Music by Stew and Heidi Rodewald Created with & Directed by Joanna Settle | World Premiere

Artistic Director Bill Rauch has challenged the complacent, traditional view of theater in the past several years by including in the season a third musical in a format that is more performance art than legitimate theater.  Rauch’s leap has worked for me in past years.  In 2012, Party People,  was one of my favorite productions of the season, and last year’s Unfortunates knocked around in our minds and conversations for many days after we saw it.  All in all, we have been glad that Rauch took the chance on a different format of entertainment, and we even congratulated ourselves on our enjoyment of the productions which made our more stodgy friends uncomfortable.

Well, Family Album is going to make our self-congratulation difficult for many years.  Family Album is created in the performance-piece style, but it is embarrassingly juvenile, undeveloped, and unprofessional.  The author, Stew, phoned in a one-eighth-baked book accompanied by a simplistic, repetitive score.

We are told that the story is about dealing with yourself as a middle-aged artist who is confronting the tensions between making art and making money to provide security for your family.  The problem is that we are told in boring, straight-forward words about the tension.  There are no real characters, just people delivering sophomoric line after sophomoric line.  Sometimes those lines are spoken, but often they are badly sung.

Even potentially cute ideas, such as a song with a “black men can ski” lyric goes nowhere.  That one line is repeated 100 times, killing any interest anyone could have in the topic.  None of the songs pass muster as a complete work.  Most feature only two or three chords, repetitive lyrics, and an utter lack of creativity.  There are a few tongue-twisting numbers, but they serve only to throw more cringe-worthy rhymes and simple, simple, simple thoughts at the audience.

There must have been no acceptance criteria or quality control for this commissioned work.  Nothing good is memorable.  We do remember the playbill notes that promise that the performance was fast-paced although the running time was unknown at publication.  In fact, the performance was tedious, loud — not fast, and it crawled through three hours of clock time.  I thought I was going to remember some of the worst rhymes, but fortunately alcohol and sleep has helped me forget them.

Adding to the abysmal books/score is a mostly terrible, non-acting cast.  Over half of the performers on stage are musicians, not actors. The distinction shows. I feel uncomfortable faulting a professional guitar player or drummer for being wooden in their speeches.  But, damn it, the acting by the musicians was excretably awful. The Oregon Shakespeare Festival made a stupid decision to include musicians in the acting company.

Moreover, the musicians who were brought in for Family Album and are only in this one production, don’t sing very well.  They sound awful through the over-hot microphones in the small space of the Thomas Theater.  Their voices were harsh, unmelodic, and unpleasant.

There was talent wasted on stage.  Ashland veteran Miriam A. Laube sang extremely well, looked gorgeous, and did a credible job with the awful things that were put in her mouth.  Daniel T. Parker, another genuine OSF company member, made his impossible role almost entertaining at times.  And, newcomer Lawrence Stallings owned the stage when he gave a solo or was allowed to dance and move.  He could act, too!

All three of the people with talent hold Equity cards.  I am not a natural fan of credentials, but the Equity asterisk* was glaringly missing from the most one-dimensional, marginal “actors” in the Family Album cast list.

The only debate we have about Family Album is whether it is the worst thing we’ve ever seen at OSF.  I am still holding out for the 2004 disaster Oedipus Complex, but my husband thinks Family Album is the winner.

Ozdachs Rating

0 Syntaxes out of 5

By |2014-08-17T13:28:35-07:00August 17, 2014|osf, plays|1 Comment
Go to Top