The Taming of the Shrew

Ashland, OR
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

The Taming of the Shrew at Oregon ShakespeareThe Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare

There’s so much chemistry between Vilma Silva’s Katherina and Michael Elich’s Petruchio that this male chauvinism manual almost escapes its own words.  Silva is a striking, confident, beautiful woman.  Elich is vigorous and sexy in a way that seems unique to wiry bald men.  Together on stage the are in love and lust.

This production is a straight-on shrew taming.  No winks, nods, or knowing looks that sometimes indicate that Kate is complicit in a charade.  No, in this staging Kate and Petruchio may be in love, but Kate learns submission to her man.

I have a difficult time cheering a great production that is delivering an unsavory message.  Not only does this Shrew avoid a socially redeeming nuance, it instead revels in providing an excellent exposition in proper male and female role models.  The night creeped me out.

Oddly, the most enthusiastic praise of the evening came from women in the audience.  The on-stage physical tension apparently made the male dominance in the text okay?  One female friend waxed eloquent on how Kate’s instructions to the other wives on how to behave was the clearest and best she’d ever seen.  Well, yes, but…

When I tried to voice discomfort over the literalness of this production I was cut off with the question that didn’t I know that a woman directed the show?  Well, yes, but…

Where’s Billy Jean King smacking Bobby Riggs when I need her? (more…)

By |2007-08-16T11:18:00-07:00August 16, 2007|osf, plays, Uncategorized|0 Comments

Tartuffe

Ashland, OR
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Tartuffe at Oregon ShakespeareTartuffe by Moliere, translated by Ranjit Bolt

Damn, it’s satisfying when a hoary piece of “accessible” culture is given genuine life on stage. 

When I last saw Tartuffe it was played for all of the pretentious fluff possible.  The play had no present meaning, unless you read the scholarly playbill notes.  It was a happy vacuous evening of Theatre. 

Oregon Shakespeare Festival, and the 2002 translation by Ranjit Bolt, have banished that cotton candy Tartuffe from my memory. They’ve created a production that’s equally good fun and sharp satire.

The book is still happily over-populated with couplets that have the audience anticipating and dreading the payoff rhyme. Yet, the dialog is wickedly focused on its target: religious hypocrisy.

The language sounds unforced and honors Moliere much more than a translation into archaic English.  Bolt’s words left a friend sure that Tartuffe (Anthony Heald) was channeling Jimmy Swaggart. This Tartuffe was written just last week after yet another mega-church preacher was caught in bed, using drugs, doing things he denounced from the pulpit on Sunday.

Ah, but this scandal is so much more fun than the ones that litter the media.  Tartuffe’s saga includes alert characters who say the bitchy lines you find yourself screaming at the TV when today’s phony men of the cloth take center stage.

Linda Alper as Dorine, the maid, steals the show with her verbal and physical antics, stirring the family up against the interloper Tartuffe.  She was given the lines by Moliere/Bolt, but her eyes and the rest of her body are fully her responsibility.  Thank you, Linda!

The costume designer and actor Eileen DeSandre share honors for starting the play off in the proper tone. As the grandmother under Tartuffe’s spell, DeSandre is comical but unfortunately believable.  The headpiece she wears while delivering the play-beginning speeches is a quintuple ruffled lacy black-and-white thing that looks like an upside down albino wattle. (more…)

By |2007-08-15T19:05:00-07:00August 15, 2007|osf, plays, Uncategorized|1 Comment

Blackbird

San Francisco
at the American Conservatory Theater

Blackbird postersBlackbird by David Harrower

This is a conversation play. Two actors are alone on the stage for an 85-minute one-act roller coaster. I flashed on the movie My Dinner with Andre.  I loved that film’s ability to renew the conversation and make me want to listen in even longer.

Blackbird is better. 

It means more. It handles one of those hot-button topics that start the media and politicians frothing. Its dialog raises insidious question after insidious question.

Moreover, there is no tidying-up of the situation.  There’s no relieving final clarity that lets the audience march out together with a single vision. To me, this murkiness is realistic and dramatically necessary.

In fact, after leaving the theater we argued about the characters, their realness, their mental health (“She had lost it.  She was AWOL from a mental hospital.” “No way… she has a successful career, remember?” “Only in her mind. Look how she dressed.” “Exactly.  She’s dressed just like the successful 20-something year old she says she is.”), over how they changed since they first met, and, of course, over the details of their relationship.

Our argument started in the sidewalk on Geary Street, lasted through our post-matinĂ©e cocktails and pizza, kept going at breakfast next morning, and was reprised at dinner last night. It wasn’t only argument.  We found ourselves discussing our agreement with the play’s potentially most controversial and non-conformist raised question.  But, we happily and heatedly talked about the degrees of motivation for each character, the reasonableness of the script, and whether ultimately the play meant anything.

There was no dispute over the quality of the performance, however.  Steven Culp (as Peter/Ray) and Jessi Campbell (Una) took the twists of the words and made them into believable conversation.  They were physical in a non-action play, but neither ever looked like they were stretching to add unnecessary movement. They created crazy kinetic tension without stepping over the play’s taut physical limits. The cast was dangerously close to perfection. (Some people complained that Campbell’s English accent came and went, but I didn’t notice.)

Director Loretta Greco blended the acting and crafts into a unified and seamless scene. Everything fit.

The modern office lunchroom set was an effective impersonal backdrop, matching the mood and the pacing.  The lighting, center stage and background, added its own soul-draining industrial tint. Friend David F. Draper’s modern costumes were appropriate (except for her boots) and appropriately unhelpful in giving definitive answers to who these characters were.

Blackbird is my type of play.  Emotionally menacing, meaningful, and unresolved.

Some in our theater group initially were cooler to Blackbird because they weren’t sure they believed this or that event would happen as told in the script. The next day they said the play was growing on them, although they didn’t need to see it again. Well, it didn’t need to grow on me and from start of the curtain call I knew I will happily see another performance.  I say:

Play Rating: 5 Syntaxes out of 5

By |2007-05-14T08:09:00-07:00May 14, 2007|plays, Uncategorized|2 Comments

Gem of the Ocean

Ashland, OR
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Gem of the OceanGem of the Ocean by August Wilson

The excellence of Oregon Shakespeare Festival’s production serves to point out the flaws in this first episode of August Wilson’s 10-play series on the Afro-American experience in America in the 20th Century.  The evening oozes importance and great meaning.  The cast rises to the challenge.  Unfortunately, this penultimately written saga tries to do too much and fails to do much.  The play confuses instead of illuminates. 

Set in  Pittsburgh in1904, the story deals with the ambiguity of the new de jure freedom for black people which runs up against the de facto economic and physical control of their lives. The central character is a magical 285-year-old “spiritual advisor” (Greta Oglesby as Aunt Ester). In her house we meet the woman she hopes to entrust her secrets and magic to (Shona Tucker as Black Mary), Aunt Ester’s close friend and ex-slave (G. Valmont Thomas as Solly Two Kings), Aunt Ester’s gatekeeper (Josiah Phillips as Eli), a newly arrived African-American refugee from Alabama (Kevin Kennerly as Citizen Barlow), Shona’s brother who has been co-opted by the white mayor to enforce tough justice in the black community (Derrick Lee Weeden as Caesar), and the white housewares peddler (Bill Geisslinger as Rutherford Selig).

The production does an excellent job with each character, and OSF handles the magical dream-like scenes clearly and well. 

The actors have strong voices, and the moments of spirituals sung by the characters are mood-creating and haunting.  The simple staging focuses the audience on the movement and the words.  The performance is steady, straight forward, and powerful.  One magic moment involves a boat ride which could easily be hokey in less professional hands, but at OSF you felt the tossing of waves during the narrated storm.

Each performer deserves his or her own moment of praise.

Oglesby balanced the physical and spiritual sides of her character without a jar.  Her voice raised in occasional song is worth the price of admission itself! 

Thomas is so big and so perfect in his movement that his equally on-target speaking is deceptively skilled and almost under appreciated.  By turns he is gentle and subtle and then angry and dangerous. But, he’s always underplaying and drawing the audience to him. 

Weeden owns his thin, mean, conflicted character who is no Caesar and all Cassius. Tucker radiates youth and growth in her apprentice role.  And, Bill Gesslinger plays a character and not himself. (Okay, it sounds like faint praise but after seeing him do the same character in many different plays, I was relieved to see something else in Gem.)

But, even with top-quality in cast, direction, and staging, the result remains a production tour de force in service of an uneven piece of theater.  Plot lines were introduced, tended, and left unresolved. New complications arose in late scenes which were neither needed nor handled.  The play ended at least three times, but even when the lights went up, there are many “yes, buts” to be answered. 

Instead of powerful theater, we were exposed to overpowering ideas.  These were exquisitely important ideas about American and its people. But, bringing them forward and leaving them on stage is not enough.

The artists who gave us the evening deserved the standing energetic ovation they received. But, the overall Gem experience is only
Play rating: 4 Syntaxes out of 5

By |2007-04-30T14:31:00-07:00April 30, 2007|osf, plays, Uncategorized|2 Comments

On the Razzle

Ashland, OR
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

On the Razzle at Oregon Shakespeare
On the Razzle by Tom Stoppard

Either your the type of person who laughs non-stop at silly sit-coms or you’re not.  If you’re not, then there’s no use in someone talking to you about the quality of the script, the acting, the physical humor, or any of the other skills employed in the show. 

I am not a sit-com aficionado.  So don’t waste your time explaining how right and funny a plot line you saw was.

And, that’s my feeling about On the Razzle, Oregon Shakespeare’s obligatory farce for the season. 

It just isn’t my type of play. I can agree that the word play is witty, well-written, and engaging.  The story is Hello Dolly mixed slightly with one of Shakespeare’s cross-dressing suitor comedies. It’s cute, quick, smart, and lively.  This production’s staging is innovative and catchy.  The costumes are appropriately gaudy.  The night is a visual bouquet created by trained  and determined florists.

The actors are downright flawless.  Fun, in-character, happily over-the-top, yet comfortable.  They mix perfect line delivery with spot-on physical movements.  Tony DeBruno (Zangler, the merchant) maneuvers through his malaprop-laden speeches expertly, and the timing of his farcical collaborators is impeccable. Director Laird Williamson deserves my personal thanks for not casting the perpetually bouncy, scenery chewer Chris DuVall in this play.

“I hated it!” started off one of our group as the entire house left the theater with wide smiles on our faces.  You couldn’t not be smiling because you’d just spent two hours in a clean, welcoming up-beat madhouse. So, she admitted with a little prodding, she hadn’t hated the production.  But, rather, she thought it was just was a waste of time.

That’s my judgment, too.  Seeing On the Razzle spent time and money that could have been used to see a real play.

Two Syntaxes Out of 5

By |2007-04-29T12:36:00-07:00April 29, 2007|osf, plays, Uncategorized|2 Comments
Go to Top