The Very Merry Wives of Windsor, Iowa

Ashland, Oregon
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

The Very Merry Wives of Windsor, IowaThe Very Merry Wives of Windsor, Iowa
Written by Alison Carey
Adapted from the play by William Shakespeare

I cannot recall walking out at intermission at Oregon Shakespeare Festival before, but unless I was going to start hissing from the front row, I had to leave last night.

This sledge-hammer piece of political correctness is so crass and blatant that I felt creepily unclean as a beneficiary of its message of equality. On a grand scale, VMWWI is a modern adaptation of the jealousy and intrigue depicted in Shakespeare’s The Merry Wives of Windsor.  In this play there is a married female couple and single lesbians added to the traditional mix of confusion.  I like the concept, and treated with any sort of artistry, the production would have been modern, insightful, and enjoyable.

But, what flat, anvil-heavy crap was put in front of us instead! The author has the talent of a self-righteous high school student intent on making sure that even the slowest member of the audience understood the important message being dumped on stage.  I pity the straight liberals in the house who were the obvious targets of the evening.  They had to come back to their seats or else they would have been thought intolerant of the topic. 

The mental masturbation script occasionally had some funny one liners and scenes.  The best was in the second act where, according to reports from friends who stayed, actor Cathrine Coulson was given a piece of cut wood to hold.  She clutched it in her arms, and another character asked her for it by saying, “My log, lady.”  Coulson played the Log Lady on the cult television show Twin Peaks.

That funny, in-crowd line fairly represents the adaption script.  That Log Lady reference was like most of the hip, in-crowd winking and nudging that constituted the play. Except that most of the rest of the gags were nasty, cheap jabs at Mitt Romney and other evil enemies of enlightenment instead of being gentle, benign references to rarefied culture.

I am a sucker for art broadening horizons and challenging cultural assumptions.  I am particularly susceptible to gay-themed acceptance stories.  Big Eden is one of my favorite small town acceptance stories of all time.  That movie was unmistakable, but sweet, engaging, and not completely predictable.

Damn it. You don’t get to pass off cringe-inducing stereotypes and one-dimensional characters just because you know you’re on the side of the angels. Sure, Shakespeare had broad characters and traded on the stereotypes of his time.  But, the artistry of the language makes all the difference.  With Shakespeare there are seemingly an infinite number of interpretations possible for every character and every line.  In one production the villain is self-aware and in the next, using the same text, he is oblivious to his faults.  In VMWWI it’s hard to image a saving directorial vision that would justify another production of the flatly-written piece. Ever.

The lesbian marriage concept would have been better served if OSF had skipped employing Carey to adapt Shakespeare.  Instead, using the same excellent costumes, sharp set, talented cast, and same-sex couple casting, the evening would have been much more satisfying and point-making with the original story.

I am getting weary of leaving OSF plays saying, “Yes, but the actors gave their all and I stood and applauded for them.”  Although there was no standing ovation last night, once again the actors deserve rave reviews at a bad evening of theater.

Compliments to David Kelly for a smooth, smarmy Mitt Romney/Falstaff character. He seemed to be having fun.

Coulson was a fine and colorful Miss Quickly.  I especially liked Judith-Marie Bergan as the innkeeper. I feel sorry for Robin Goodrin Nordli for her wasted talents as Francie Ford, and my sympathy also to Gina Daniels (Alice Ford), Terri McMahon (Margaret Page), Ted Deasy (George Page), and the pretty cheerleader boys.

Alex Jaeger’s costumes were more alive than the script deserved.  Chris Acebo’s simple, corn-strewn set had us smiling before the play opened and the words brought us down.

Yeah, VMWWI is an archetypal waste of artistic talent that should have been killed or corrected long before it was inflicted on OSF’s loyal audience.

Ozdachs Rating
0 Syntaxes out of 5… although there should be an icon for Dog Gone to indicate a walk-out mid production.

By |2012-08-15T12:52:00-07:00August 15, 2012|osf, plays, Uncategorized|3 Comments

On Dirty, Thieving Politicians

In our negative narrative world,  the dirty, thieving politicians are all deserving only of scorn, criticism, and abuse.  Members of Congress are out-of-touch, corrupt, pandering, and stupid buffoons.  The ones we vote for are only the of lesser of two evils on the ballot.  The office holders of national statue are truly kings of the dung heap worthy of the personal loathing that the opposing parties hurl at each other’s leaders.

I feel the imperative to distrust government and to vilify every single Member of Congress.  Whether it’s Fox News or MSNBC, the sneering, impartial, truth-telling reporters make it clear that America is ill-served by its officials.

Except it isn’t so.  My personal experience contradicts the dominant nightmare paradigm.

Yesterday I saw my Congresswoman in person for the first time in her tenure.  I was invited to go as part of a group of small business owners to hear her discuss of the Affordable Care Act, aka: Obamacare. 

My Member of Congress showed up on time, and chatted sociably with her fellow panelists while they waited to be introduced.  I know this because she was sitting on a folding chair in the audience directly in front of me.  She was in Row 1 and I, having been anal-retentively early, was in Row 2.   My Congresswoman was neither haughty nor remote while in the audience or when she spoke.  When she took the podium she gave facts and figures and stories without notes. Her  responses to questions were on target and not evasive talking points.  Her face and gestures showed her connection to the people in the room, and she gave a warm feeling.

What yesterday’s event reminded me was how good we have it in the United States and how good our representatives are. Whether you agree with my Congresswoman’s positions on a particular issue, I think she – and so many other politicians – should be lauded and thanked for meeting real people and listening to us day after day.

A year and a half after Congresswoman Gabby Giffords was shot at a constituent meeting, my Member of Congress was still incredibly accessible and vulnerable.  Sure, I was a wearing a logo-embossed business shirt and am a white man of a certain age.  But, still.  I didn’t have to go through metal detectors or a weapons search.  I wasn’t kept a reasonable distance from her –she just sat down in front of me in a metal auditorium chair. I was not questioned about my political views before I entered the room, and I wasn’t coached how to act by anyone warming up the audience.

I left very impressed with my Congresswoman, Representative Nancy Pelosi.  Yes, I live in the district of a very well-known, very targeted, very slammed Member of Congress.  But, Representative  Pelosi didn’t show any signs of being a star or of being a political target.  She was matter-of-fact and direct.

I am very lucky to live where I can see powerful government people when I, myself, am no one special.  I am very lucky to have a representative  who works so hard listening and keeping on top of so many facts on so many issues. 

I believe that Nancy Pelosi is not the only Representative working long hours for the public good. The  good people – of both parties – care.  

After yesterday, reveling in cheap-shot attack photo captions on Facebook strikes me as dangerous and mean. Are we better off when we attack our elected officials for simply breathing?  I’m not saying that we have to applaud their views if we disagree with them on the issues.  But, unless someone is caught in a wide-stance, toe-tapping hypocrisy, I think we’ve trashed our politicians enough for a while.

About the only surprising point I learned about Rep. Pelosi was how very unphotogenic she is.  She’s positively anti-photogenic.  I always thought that she looked like she was a victim of too much plastic surgery.  In real life she appears friendly, relaxed, and attractive.  Her face can move! Yet almost every picture I took of her showed her face in some twisted gesture,  eyes darting evilly, or her hands doing accusatory pointing.  I think she’s so alive and moving that cameras cannot keep up. 

Of the 70 or so photos, here’s the only 7 iPad shots that don’t make her look awful!

By |2012-07-14T12:47:00-07:00July 14, 2012|philippic, Uncategorized|3 Comments

Why We Cannot Ticket Cars Enough to Stop Pedestrian Deaths

I make no excuses for fast-driving, red-light-running, I-yield-to-no-one-drivers. I do not minimize the pain caused by aggressive and distracted operators of cars, trucks, SUVs, or MUNI buses. But folks! We have to move beyond the eco-politics paradigm where pedestrians are always good, bicyclists okay, and motor vehicles are evil, if we are going to decrease the number of traffic injuries.

The news media unhelpfully hypes the vision of vehicular berserkers. For example, Sunday’s Examiner lamented the lack of outrage against one motorist who “struck and killed a pedestrian.” Are we sure that the driver was at fault in that accident? Or, maybe there is a reason why there is no outrage directed that particular person?

Most every day I both walk and drive places. I obey every law when I‘m behind the wheel. But, I admit that I routinely jaywalk in mid-intersections, cross against the “Don’t Walk”, and start crossing early against the red.

At the same time, I cannot drive from home in San Francisco’s Noe Valley district for 15 minutes without having to take action to avoid a collision with a bicycle rider or pedestrian who is violating a traffic law. Ever.

Pedestrians regularly cross against red lights when they see a bus coming or jump out in front of right-turning cars because they have only 5 seconds left on the Don’t Walk timer. Bicyclists split lanes on the right and surge straight in front of right-hand-signaling and turning cars. Bicyclists also frequently run stop signs, turn left and right from weird lanes, ride against traffic for a few hundred feet, and blow red lights.

In San Francisco there is no enforcement of traffic laws for pedestrians or bicyclists. I’m not talking about LA-style “Don’t Walk at an empty intersection” jaywalking tickets, but about tagging people doing truly unsafe things.

San Francisco’s anti-car attitude is proving stronger than the desire to truly reduce death and injury. Official enforcement is completely mono-focused. The police department says bicyclists aren’t ticketed because they are hard to catch. Huh? Are armed robbers easier to nab?

Meanwhile, the cops always blame the motor vehicle driver when there’s a pedestrian involved. I saw a young man do the countdown-timer sprint at Castro and 18th two weeks ago in the middle afternoon. The runner lept in front of a SUV which was turning right on a green light and had already entered the crosswalk. There was a cop car waiting at the intersection which lit up and stopped the SUV driver, even though the pedestrian was charging up on the SUV from the right, rear blindside.

We are rightly concerned about traffic safety. But, the “massive internal self-policing from cyclists after the incident on Castro and Market” that one academic sees as a solution for bicyclists’ misbehavior is politically correct horse manure. It’s dangerous excrement, too. Pedestrians and bicyclists are no more likely to self-police than are road-raging BMW jockeys. But, they are more likely to be injured or killed.

Let’s be less biased. Let’s, instead, be effective. Let’s mount a well-publicized, balanced campaign of education and enforcement.

Article first published as Why We Cannot Ticket Cars Enough to Stop Pedestrian Deaths on Technorati.

By |2012-05-08T08:58:00-07:00May 8, 2012|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Maureen McGovern at the Rrazz Room

The curse of the Rrazz Room Cabaret is that its runs are so short that you cannot tell people of great performances there before they are over.  We enjoyed Maureen McGovern there last night immensely, but she’s gone after tonight’s show.  But, if you act quickly there’s still time to Come On Down!

The live Maureen has more power and personality than the too melodic, blandish Maureen I recall from recordings.  She was accompanied at the Rrazz Room by only piano and bass, and that’s all she needed when she sang arrangements of  the Beatles, Pete Seeger, and Simon and Garfunkel. 

She touched the holy folk-rock hymns of my youth, and sang them mostly slower with more annunciation and clarity than the original.  She played with folk-rock fire, and gave us an enhanced, very emotionally satisfying show.

Geoff spent the cab ride home talking about the great range of McGovern’s voice.  He is right, of course.  Her voice is beautiful.  For me, though, more than her control of the notes, it was arrangements and feelings that made the songs.

This post is short so I can get this up for people in San Francisco to make their plans for tonight!

Ozdachs Rating .

By |2012-05-06T10:14:00-07:00May 6, 2012|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Seagull

Ashland, Oregon
Opening Performance, February 26, 2012
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Seagull

Seagull
Written by Anton Chekhov
Adapted and Directed by Libby Appel

A three-word summary review of Seagull:  unfortunate play selection.

Everything about this production was well done.  The actors hit the right note in everything they did.  Chris Acebo’s set took inventive advantage of the New Theater’s intimacy.  Deb Dryden’s clothes were rich and a nice counterpart to the early sparseness of the stage.  Libby Apple directed a consistent, restrained, and intelligent vision of this Chekhov classic.  Even with all the top-notch craft work, the scenes dragged and nothing interesting was revealed.

I liked the production of Chekhov’s Cherry Orchid a few years ago, so I didn’t walk into the building wondering why I was there.  But, this play was too predictable and unrelievedly negative.  The characters don’t develop in any significant way, bad things happen, and time moves slowly. 

The cast navigated the turgid script admirably.  I enjoyed seeing Tasso Feldman (Kostya) in a dramatic, not-just-a-cute-kid role.  Armando Duran (Dr. Dorn) still has the looks to come off as a handsome, world weary rake.  I was interested in seeing the skills of Ashland newcomer Kathryn Meisle (Irina). Michael Hume (Pyotr) did a fine job deteriorating into an old man of 60-something.  And so on and so on.

These thoughts tracking the actors’ careers were going through my head during the performance.  I was desperate to keep my mind going and to keep focus.  The narrative was not doing it.

There were minor parts of the production I would change:

  • The shiny deep blue of the stage didn’t work for me;  if it was supposed to help us think we were outdoors, wouldn’t earth brown be better?
  • This new adaptation could have helped itself by making Michael Hume older than 62.  When the doctor told Hume that his physical condition would just go downhill because he was past 60, the mostly white-haired audience snickered.  I don’t think it was supposed to be a laugh line.
  • The blocking had the actors marching too close to my row A seat, and I thought I was going to be accidentally hit on the back swing of Hume’s cane at one point.
  • The dead seagull prop looked positively fuzzy and cuddly.

But, let’s not spend any more time craping about details.  It was a fine production of a story that didn’t reach me.

Ozdachs Rating:  2 Syntaxes out of 5 

By |2012-02-27T14:26:00-08:00February 27, 2012|osf, plays, Uncategorized|0 Comments
Go to Top