“Behfarmaheen (If You Please)” at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Behfarmaheen (If You Please)

Created and performed by Barzin Akhavan
Directed by Desdemona Chiang 

Ashland, OR at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival July 31 – September 15, 2024

Behfarmaheen Masthead

Behfarmaheen Masthead, OSF design by Krzysztof Bednarski

Author and Performer Barzin Akhavan starts the story of his schizophrenic but also blended American/Persian life with a long dialog in Farsi. He explains in the after-show talkback that the opening mimics his and his family’s feelings of not understanding during their first days/months/years in the United States. The scene works and he didn’t really need to explain his intent, but his desire that we UNDERSTAND is both tangible and touching.

The feeling of wanting to share, explain, and celebrate runs throughout the one-act show. Behfarmaheen, like the other one-person shows at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival this year, is a very personable, very moving, very revelatory treat.

He helps the audience share the feeling of foreignness in two especially noteworthy scenes. In one he teaches the us how to pronounce the play’s name, Behfarmaheen. We are learning the meaning and how to say this foreign Farsi word, and that process helps us experience some of what he and his family went through.

Similarly, to let us join in a celebration Barzin teaches us how to dance like his Persian family. It was quick, eye-opening, and fun.

Barzin Akhavan

Barzin Akhavan. Photo by Jenny Graham.

Barzin was four in 1980 when his family moved to the US from his birth country Germany. They were already refugees from the Iran and moving, trying to put down roots, and trying to figure out the culture is obviously THE focus of his formative years. But, wait, there’s more.

We see and feel him and his family deal with the American culture, strive to understand, and still be an outsider. But there are scenes that focus on him becoming Homecoming King of his high school and a passing mention of how he was student body president. These aren’t positions of an interloper, at least not in my experience.

Well, maybe. Because his mother and father, especially his father, take some time comprehending who their son is. To the present day.

The dichotomy between achieving objective success and feeling seen and understood enriches the show from scene to scene. Barzin wants us to see how we feel and react isn’t dependent on the culture we grew up in… except, very pointedly, when it does affect how we view our lives and what’s going on.

I was intrigued with the details of Barzin’s life. From being the district winner of the Daughters of the American Revolution high school essay contest to wrestling on stage naked in a political/emotional comedy sketch in front of his unprepared father, the man has breadth and amazing stories. I loved hearing all about him and having his basically positive perspective seep out throughout the show.

I confess that some of his approach confused me. He is focused on 1980 with all the important events in the world that happened that year and has a storyboard in the lobby before the show that showcased Iran-Iraq war, John Lenon assignation, the exiled Shah dying in Egypt, more Iranian politics, Richard Pryor burning himself while freebasing, the “Miracle on Ice” at the winter Olympics, and more. Then during the performance Barzin runs a game show where two real audience members compete for prizes while they answer up to six questions about the storyboard.

Barzin Akhavan in Behfarmeheen

Barzin Akhavan hosting the game show in Behfarmeheen. Photo by Jenny Graham.

Huh?

I get that Barzin’s coming to America in 1980 fit in with the other important world events, but, but, but… the events are not intrinsically part of any scene in the show. The turmoil in Iran most likely forced his family to emigrate and eventually immigrate to the US, but I don’t recall that being stated? And, I need an explanation of why he selected certain events. And, the game show was not exciting or fun.

The best I can figure out is that Barzin really wanted people to focus on the 1980 events and offering a prize for remembering the most facts made some of us concentrate on the high/low points of the year. I would weave some of the stories into a scene or two or else I’d leave out the storyboard and game show.

Barzin Akhavan during rehearsal

Barzin Akhavan. Photo by Jenny Graham.

The other distraction I ran into was the breaking of chronological order. I felt I was seeing progression and better understanding of life, college and acting were coming along. Then we were back in high school or before.

I didn’t know when I saw the show that many moments are adlibbed. He mentioned that format in the talkback. Whenever the lights come on and show the audience, Barzin is not on script. Apparently, there is a phrase or hand gesture that lets the stage manager know that the scene is over, but there is not a fixed story.

I assume Barzin is traveling down some activity, audience mood, or something-induced memory which he translates into a scene. Maybe the chronological location of the scene is not important and that’s why the show goes back and forth throughout his life. And, I realize that life and its revelations are not necessarily well ordered. Still, I would appreciate a deliberate unveiling of the overall story that the improv structure does not support.

Fortunately, overall, this is another must-see show featuring a man whose work I’ve long enjoyed. And, I need to acknowledge he must have incredible guts to put so any sides of him on stage for us.

Thank you, Barzin for sharing, showing, and letting us in. And, thank you OSF for supporting Barzin and the other performers this year that gave us such intimate moments in the Thomas.

Behfarmaheen is definitely worth seeing. A happy Play Rating: 4 out of 5 Syntaxes event!

By |2024-09-12T17:10:55-07:00September 12, 2024|osf, plays|0 Comments

“Smote This” at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Smote This,
A Comedy About God …and Other Serious $H*T

Created and performed by Rodney Gardiner
Directed by Raz Golden

Ashland, OR at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival March 22 – May 12, 2024

SMOTE This masthead

 

This one-person show by OSF veteran Rodney Gardiner is intense, personal, real, and not to be missed (and like all of the one-person shows the run is too short, so go now).

I am struggling to figure out which level of the show I should tell about. On the top-level, the physical story starts out with Rodney at his father’s funeral which leads to a discussion of his family and how he came to the United States. That leads to dealing with his father’s long-term health issues, his mother’s life and how she parented. We learn about isolated events in young Rodney’s life, the “miracles” that touch him, and eventually his life with a wife and two Blewish children.

This show is billed as a comedy, and Rodney has very witty, fun lines. He is physically humorous, energetic, and a happy ball of energy on stage.

Except the jokey story is actually about the struggle of undocumented refugees living in a poor community among drug dealers and other distractions. The family has issues, and we spend a lot of time giggling at the “funny” lines about things like his father dying alone under the photograph of a blond white Jesus. Or, about how as a child he woke up from a dream because his mother started beating him and his two brothers while they were sound asleep in bed. Very funny scene, except …

Rodney Gardier in Smote This

Rodney Gardier in Smote This. Photo by Jenny Graham

The first time I saw the show I was very bothered by all the humor. I guess the second time I knew what was coming, and Rodney is a great comic. But, still, we are laughing at awful stuff.

Throughout the show there is a genuine tension between the organized religion Rodney’s been taught and the spirituality of his community and family. “What to believe” is a central issue which strengthens the story, but really isn’t reinforced as the dilemma to consider when seeing the performance.

This new show was a great 50 minutes. And like many new works of art, we spent a lot of time afterwards reflecting and considering how we would improve it. For one thing, we didn’t like “Smote This…” as a title. I object mainly because I am not sure Rodney comes down on the side smiting anything, certainly he’s not throwing away all of the religion he’s been exposed to.

A lot of the humor and emphasis compares feeling-rich, family-rich, religious-rich Black Caribbean community with the dominant white world. His perspective is revelatory and sharp. But, his struggles with what to believe, family, and religion are more widespread. When he rewrites the show for its second incarnation (not planned, that I know of), I hope he projects his personal experiences into a more universal dilemma. His perspective and insight are spectacular, but his observations apply to a wider scope of experiences.

Thank you, Rodney, for sharing so much of your background and life. Thank you for sharing your comedic talent. Now, let’s figure out how to get me released from my guilt at laughing at tragedy and also make your pointed themes apply more broadly.

This excellent performace rates Rating: 4 and 1/2 Syntaxes out of 5

By |2024-04-27T11:48:17-07:00April 24, 2024|osf, plays|0 Comments

“Born with Teeth” at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Born with Teeth

OSF Presents the Alley Theatre Production
By Liz Duffy Adams
Directed by Rob Melrose

Ashland, OR at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Born with Teeth masthead
This two-person show is good entertainment. Witty, quick, well-acted.

The plot has contemporary playwrights William Shakespeare (Bradley James Tejeda) and Christopher “Kit” Marlowe (Alex Purcell) sparring over words, personal behavior, and sex. In talks the director has said that academics who have read the script say that nothing in the plot couldn’t have happened. However, warning! That doesn’t mean any of the interactions on stage actually happened.

The plot explores relatively recent research into Marlowe’s life. The current theory, I have been told, is that Marlowe didn’t die in a random bar fight as history has previously said. Instead, he was targeted and killed because he was involved in palace intrigue, spying and turning over innocent people to the authorities, and blatant homosexuality.

Marlowe was allowed to be known homosexual only because his lovers included powerful people but in the end powerful people were uncomfortable with what Marlowe knew and did. In the final scene Marlowe and Shakespeare say good-bye as Marlowe knows that assassins are waiting for him.

Alex Purcell Bradley and James Tejeda

Alex Purcell Bradley and James Tejeda. Photo by Jenny Graham

On stage we see Shakespeare and Marlowe flirt, a couple times very physically. Marlowe is also chronically trying to recruit Shakespeare into his spy ring, but Will refuses and insists on sticking to writing… until Shakespeare commits an out-of-character act at the end which helps end the play. (I am still shaking my head saying, “Tsk, tsk!” at Shakespeare’s uncharacteristic political deed which is best left unspecified but which makes the performance a short one-act.)

The dialogue is fast, fun, and full of the lovely feel of Shakespeare… probably because some of Shakespeare’s lines are used to illustrate the writing happening on stage.
Overall, the scenes fly by. There are a good number of good one-liners. There is sincere laughter from the audience. It’s fun. We were amused to watch the actors and we enjoyed the language, especially the words from the 17th Century.

Born with Teeth is especially engaging for Shakespeare fans who are up on the latest AI that shows which acts of which Shakespeare plays are more stylistically Marlowe and were probably written by Kit not Will.

On the whole this was simply fun to watch and hear. That’s not a bad thing, but we don’t really learn anything about their collaboration or how the possible flirtation influenced their writing or made anyone’s lives different in real life.

I am happy to have seen this theater-goers mental masturbation show which was well done but fails the “so what” test. Go see it if you’re in town.  It’s  a good    Play Rating 3 out of 5 Syntaxes

By |2024-04-24T13:44:41-07:00April 24, 2024|osf, plays|0 Comments

“Bring Down the House, Part II”

by William Shakespeare
adapted by Rosa Joshi and Kate Wisniewski
directed by Rosa Joshi

Ashland, OR
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Bring Down the House, Part One: Ensemble. Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.
Bring Down the House, Part One (no photos yet posted for Part Two)
Ensemble. Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.

Through a scheduling snafu I missed the opening of Bring Down the House, Part I and took up the Henry VI story halfway through. Because co-adapters Rosa Joshi and Kate Wisniewski have done such a good job of curating scenes and speeches, I fell right into the story, despite the potentially confusing rush of characters and battles.

I had a fun time watching the alliances among the red rose and white rose nobles. I enjoyed the progressive terminal weakness of Henry (Betsy Schwarz) and the frustration of his queen, Margaret (Vilma Silva). York (Catherine Castellanos), Edward (Brooke Parks), and Warwick (Kate Wisniewski) grab the story, move it forward — or switch it up — with decisiveness and clarity.

I confess that the crispness of the story line has gone from my mind in the two weeks since I saw the production, but at the time it was crystal clear who was doing what to whom and why. There was a terrible, logical march of activity. The characters and action were the cleanest I’ve seen in a Henry VI.

The set design by Sara Ryung Clement helped. Unlike the convoluted, endlessly plotting plot that only a contemporary of Shakespeare would instinctively understand, the stage for Henry VI is both simple and helpful. The design is mostly bare which allows the performers to describe the events, react, and act without distraction. There is way more than enough opportunity for confusion in the play without having competition from busy scenery.

Even more helpful, the family tree of the protagonists was written on the floor. Throughout the show you could glance and visually check the various relationships being discussed. At some points, the actors added more family boxes in chalk to emphasize the family complexities. The approach is novel and brilliant.

The worst aspect of Bring Down the House, Parts I and II is the unfathomable decision to change the title from Henry VI. Changing the title falsely conveys the idea that this production changes Shakespeare’s language or story. It doesn’t.

It’s common for directors to “adapt” Henry VI‘s three parts into just two. Moreover, productions of Shakespeare nearly always have cuts and maybe even some reordering of scenes. Cutting and reordering is what was done by Joshi and Wisniewski for Bring Down the House. They did it extremely well. BUT, the words and plot are pure Will.

I have heard some people wonder if they could count Bring Down the House as part of the canon. I hesitated buying a ticket myself because I am not sure I want to see Shakespeare rewritten. All of this worry is unnecessary. Bring Down the House IS Henry VI.

The other concern for traditionalists is the casting. All of the actors are female or non-binary.

“That decision had a double purpose: to serve the social justice mission of [the adaptors’] company, upstart crow collective, which is to open up opportunities on the stage for non-binary and women actors; and, simultaneously, to underscore the plays’ depictions of gender in ways that would resonate with a modern audience,” explains OSF’s blog post “Adapting to Change“.

Regardless of their gender, the actors play their parts strongly and traditionally.

My quibble is that the public deliberateness of a gender-bending cast violates Checkhov’s gun rule: “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don’t put it there.”

But, ultimately, traditionalists can again relax. The cast is superior, Shakespeare’s text and intent is unmolested, and the Yorks and the Lancasters tear down their houses quite thoroughly.

My one wish is that Joshi had shortened the choreographed battle scenes. They are over-styled and go on too long. Her Henry V had the same problem. We don’t need to see the horrors of war so slowly and eloquently displayed.

But overall, Bring Down the House, Part II is an engrossing study of flawed characters unable to stop themselves from destroying their families. This OSF production is powerful and memorable.

Ozdachs rating:
4 1/2 out of 5 Syntaxes

By |2020-03-22T15:35:08-07:00March 21, 2020|osf, plays|0 Comments

“Hairspray” at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Hairspray

created and written by John Waters
book by Thomas Meehan and Mark O’Donnell
music by Marc Shaiman
directed by Christopher Liam Moore

Ashland, OR
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Hairspray production banner from OSF

Prepare to smile, laugh, feel good, applaud, and appreciate an uplifting story sung and danced into your heart by a strong, beautiful, coordinated cast. Get ready for a perfect production of a archetypal feel-good big musical.

Beyond the summary above, everything else is just dreary supporting detail.

The story has a socially marginalized fat girl scoring a position on a TV dance show that is a bastion of white privilege and teenage snottiness. She and her black friends break barriers and win the hearts of the hottest boys… and of the audience.

Hairspray Ensemble. Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.
Ensemble. Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.

This OSF musical entertains, explains, and engages flawlessly. Director Christopher Liam Moore has created a unified, lively show that is excellent fun. Friends who have seen many productions, including on Broadway, said that this production was the best they’ve seen.

Everyone in the cast shines. I am especially happy to see veteran and returning Ashland actors sing and dance so well. Greta Oglesby (Motormouth Maybelle) is back!… in a moving, show-stopping way. We know the strong talent of Jonathan Luke Stevens (Link Larkin) and Eddy Lopez (Corny Collins) from large musical roles in prior years. And, K.T. Vogt (Prudy Pingleton), Daniel Parker (Edna Turnblad), Brent Hinckley (Harriman F. Spritzer), Chritian Bufford (Seaweed Stubbs), and David Kelly (Wilbur Turnblad) have been characters in earlier OSF musical productions — some of them meaty. Did I know that Kate Mulligan (Velma) has so much musical talent? I do now.

Greta Oglesby (Motormouth Maybelle) and David Kelly (Wilbur Turnblad). Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.
Greta Oglesby (Motormouth Maybelle) and David Kelly (Wilbur Turnblad).
Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.

The new-to-OSF performers are also incredibly talented. My favorite, no surprise, is Katy Geraghty (Tracy Turnblad) who amazes with her hot, heavy moves. She amply fills the starring role!

The crafts supporting the cast created a coherent, comfortable, over-the-top collage of activity. The set is simple, but happily garish. It complements the too-much (but just right for this show) costumes. Just look (and click on the picture to see a larger version… if your eyes can handle it):

Ensemble. Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.
Ensemble. Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.

All-in-all Hairspray is a flawless, feel-good musical romp. I have no suggestions for improvement — I believe OSF’s production delivers everything possible from the show!

Now, I don’t think you leave the theater changed. The “everyone’s included in our dance party” feels uplifting, but it’s mainstream snowflake propaganda that doesn’t deliver any revelations. Hairspray is a musical version of Green Book — a white-written, cross-racial, happy buddy story.

Still, the OSF production fulfills all the promises of the show. The writing, music, and execution are definitely on the top of the happy-musical genre. Everyone leaves the theater cherry, signing, and smiling. Hairspray deserves its standing ovation.

Ozdachs rating:
5 out of 5 Syntaxes

By |2019-03-29T14:40:40-07:00March 29, 2019|osf, plays|0 Comments
Go to Top