“A Midsummer Night’s Dream” at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

A Midsummer Night’s Dream

written by William Shakespeare
directed by Joseph Haj

Ashland, OR
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

A Midsummer Night’s Dream (2020): Jeremy Gallardo (Snug), K. T. Vogt (Robin Starveling), Cristofer Jean (Francis Flute), Ensemble. Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.
A Midsummer Night’s Dream (2020): Jeremy Gallardo (Snug), K. T. Vogt (Robin Starveling), Cristofer Jean (Francis Flute), Ensemble.
Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.

Oh dear! I really didn’t want my last comments on this COVID-19 affected season to be anything but positive. I had hoped that I would see more plays later in the year that I could sincerely applaud. Unfortunately the virus shut down all but two weeks of the season, and what I saw opening weekend is all that is written in the books for 2020.

A Midsummer Night’s Dream is the fourth of the performances I saw during the two-week season and it, unfortunately, was a forgettable bit of onstage busyness.

Midsummer at worst is a fun romp. At best, the audience is unexpectedly engaged by evil fairies or some special vision offered by the director. This Midsummer was a fun romp.

Keeping track of who was who and whom they lusted after was too much work. I enjoyed the emotions and acts scene by scene. It’s a Shakespeare comedy, for God’s sake. Just sit back and watch misdirected love, magic, and pomposity. You know that it will all turn out all right in the end.

A Midsummer Night’s Dream (2020): Ensemble (the Mechanicals). Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.
A Midsummer Night’s Dream (2020): Ensemble (the Mechanicals).
Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.

The set is simple, people wander through it as various characters, and I didn’t sense too much difference between the groups. The stage itself is bare and without energy. The costumes are overdone symbols of something. They didn’t feel like they were designed for this play.

The acting was excellent, no surprise. I thought Lauren Modica (Hippolyta and Titania) and Jonathan Luke Stevens (Lysander) stood out as lust objects worth fighting over (even if they weren’t for each other). In fact, most of the cast gave good scenes and deserve praise for their performances.

But, ultimately this Midsummer gives support to the jaded theater goers who haughtily say that, “I don’t need to see any of his comedies again.” It’s a well-acted fun romp but not a distinctive fun romp.

Ozdachs rating:
Play Rating 3 out of 5 Syntaxes



By |2020-05-31T12:50:10-07:00May 31, 2020|osf, plays|0 Comments

“Bring Down the House, Part II”

by William Shakespeare
adapted by Rosa Joshi and Kate Wisniewski
directed by Rosa Joshi

Ashland, OR
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Bring Down the House, Part One: Ensemble. Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.
Bring Down the House, Part One (no photos yet posted for Part Two)
Ensemble. Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.

Through a scheduling snafu I missed the opening of Bring Down the House, Part I and took up the Henry VI story halfway through. Because co-adapters Rosa Joshi and Kate Wisniewski have done such a good job of curating scenes and speeches, I fell right into the story, despite the potentially confusing rush of characters and battles.

I had a fun time watching the alliances among the red rose and white rose nobles. I enjoyed the progressive terminal weakness of Henry (Betsy Schwarz) and the frustration of his queen, Margaret (Vilma Silva). York (Catherine Castellanos), Edward (Brooke Parks), and Warwick (Kate Wisniewski) grab the story, move it forward — or switch it up — with decisiveness and clarity.

I confess that the crispness of the story line has gone from my mind in the two weeks since I saw the production, but at the time it was crystal clear who was doing what to whom and why. There was a terrible, logical march of activity. The characters and action were the cleanest I’ve seen in a Henry VI.

The set design by Sara Ryung Clement helped. Unlike the convoluted, endlessly plotting plot that only a contemporary of Shakespeare would instinctively understand, the stage for Henry VI is both simple and helpful. The design is mostly bare which allows the performers to describe the events, react, and act without distraction. There is way more than enough opportunity for confusion in the play without having competition from busy scenery.

Even more helpful, the family tree of the protagonists was written on the floor. Throughout the show you could glance and visually check the various relationships being discussed. At some points, the actors added more family boxes in chalk to emphasize the family complexities. The approach is novel and brilliant.

The worst aspect of Bring Down the House, Parts I and II is the unfathomable decision to change the title from Henry VI. Changing the title falsely conveys the idea that this production changes Shakespeare’s language or story. It doesn’t.

It’s common for directors to “adapt” Henry VI‘s three parts into just two. Moreover, productions of Shakespeare nearly always have cuts and maybe even some reordering of scenes. Cutting and reordering is what was done by Joshi and Wisniewski for Bring Down the House. They did it extremely well. BUT, the words and plot are pure Will.

I have heard some people wonder if they could count Bring Down the House as part of the canon. I hesitated buying a ticket myself because I am not sure I want to see Shakespeare rewritten. All of this worry is unnecessary. Bring Down the House IS Henry VI.

The other concern for traditionalists is the casting. All of the actors are female or non-binary.

“That decision had a double purpose: to serve the social justice mission of [the adaptors’] company, upstart crow collective, which is to open up opportunities on the stage for non-binary and women actors; and, simultaneously, to underscore the plays’ depictions of gender in ways that would resonate with a modern audience,” explains OSF’s blog post “Adapting to Change“.

Regardless of their gender, the actors play their parts strongly and traditionally.

My quibble is that the public deliberateness of a gender-bending cast violates Checkhov’s gun rule: “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don’t put it there.”

But, ultimately, traditionalists can again relax. The cast is superior, Shakespeare’s text and intent is unmolested, and the Yorks and the Lancasters tear down their houses quite thoroughly.

My one wish is that Joshi had shortened the choreographed battle scenes. They are over-styled and go on too long. Her Henry V had the same problem. We don’t need to see the horrors of war so slowly and eloquently displayed.

But overall, Bring Down the House, Part II is an engrossing study of flawed characters unable to stop themselves from destroying their families. This OSF production is powerful and memorable.

Ozdachs rating:
4 1/2 out of 5 Syntaxes

By |2020-03-22T15:35:08-07:00March 21, 2020|osf, plays|0 Comments

“As You Like It” at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

As You Like It

by William Shakespeare
directed by Rosa Joshi

Ashland, OR
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

As You Like It covershot
As You Like It (2019): Román Zaragoza (Orlando), Jessica Ko (Rosalind). Photo by Jenny Graham.

At the very least yet another romp through Arden Forest should be enjoyable fun. Done with artistry, a director can use this comedy to make Shakespeare seem like a feminist. After all, the freedom to love will win out and the women’s decisions share the shaping of action in Arden Forest. At least I think they do.

On the other hand, the current Oregon Shakespeare Festival’s offering didn’t even amuse me. The show is both scattered and heavy handed; it’s a supreme waste of obvious acting talent. A week after seeing it I remember some of the characters’ actions, but I never fell into the story and I never felt the production came together.

Director Rosa Joshi made some curious decisions.

The quirk that hits you from the start is the too-long, too-stylized, fascist marching in a maze pattern that the cast does in the initial scenes. Whenever it starts, the movement goes on for relatively forever. Unfortunately I was too stupid to appreciate the significance of the torturous walks that keep the play from having any momentum. So, I just watched the onstage drilling with, ahhh… bewildered patience. (I was later informed that the militaristic procession showed how rigid court life was under the new duke and could be contrasted with the life leaping in Arden Forest. Silly me for not picking this up.)

 

I assume that Christine Tschirgi, the costume designer, was just following orders when she created the ugly upholstery that the court characters had to wear. The shapes of the clothes the actors wore had nothing to do with the people in them. In any event they had the visual appeal of your grandmother’s heavy, sun-blocking curtains.

As You Like It (2019): Rex Young (Touchstone), Hannah Fawcett (Lady to Rosalind), Kate Hurster (Celia), Jessica Ko (Rosalind). Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.
Rex Young (Touchstone), Hannah Fawcett (Lady to Rosalind), Kate Hurster (Celia), Jessica Ko (Rosalind). Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.

But, it goes beyond symbolic touches that didn’t work. The casting was confusing, and not in fun, new-twist-on-an-old-play way. Rachel Crowl (Duke Senior) , the good guy that is banished to Arden Forest by Kevin Kenerly (Duke Frederick) , is played by a woman who is made up to look — and acts — younger than the usurper. I truly had a hard time getting my mind around the fact that the younger-appearing actor on stage was the senior character in the play.

Next, Crowl is a woman and the director honored her sex by altering the lines to use the construction, “The Duke, she…” when referring to her character. Maybe this was supposed to be extra good fun in a play about a female dressing as a male, but, ugh. It didn’t feel fun to me.

I am an advocate of Love is Love is Love. But, when the play itself keys off the confusion of sexual identity and resolves when the natural (sic) order is restored, adding a layer of in-your-face sexual ambiguity that is not resolved at curtain time is unhelpful. It stands in virtual opposition to the plot of Shakespeare’s play. It’s a bad directorial choice.

Basically, I don’t like trying to figure out what part of the identities we are supposed to notice and what part we should ignore as “color-blind casting”. That goes for skin color-blind casting and sex color-blind casting. Confusion has its limits as an artistic tactic.

The distracting marching, the off-putting clothes, the muddled casting, and general disarray is a failure of direction. It’s a hot mess.

On the other hand, all of the actors are excellent. There are many wonderful moments between characters, or scenes where the actors do it just right.

Crowl’s singing is wonderful. The bare-chested flexing of James Ryen was downright artistic, and I liked the contrasting scale of the flexing of the bare-chested Román Zaragoza.

As You Like It (2019): Román Zaragoza (Orlando de Boys), Kevin Kenerly (Duke Frederic, center), James Ryen (Charles), Ensemble. Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.
Román Zaragoza (Orlando de Boys), Kevin Kenerly (Duke Frederic, center), James Ryen (Charles), Ensemble. Photo by Jenny Graham, Oregon Shakespeare Festival.

Jessica Ko’s Roslind is excellent. Kenerly is perfect, and Rex Young (Touchstone) delivers some very, very fine scenes. Still the play fails.

One of my theater companions chronically suggests that I shouldn’t judge a performance on opening night. She says that the actors are nervous and more prone to errors. The company will develop more chemistry as the run goes on, she explains. And, that’s what she says about the opening night production we saw of As You Like It. She’s too kind.

The actors give us some quality moments. Unfortunately, the moments don’t work together. There isn’t a vision for the production that’s clear, and certainly not one that’s compelling.

This year’s As You Like It is a miss that earns its 3 stars for actors’ individual performances.

Ozdachs rating:
Ozdachs Rating: 3 Syntaxes

By |2019-03-28T20:41:42-07:00March 16, 2019|plays|3 Comments

Love’s Labor’s Lost at Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Ashland, Oregon
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Love’s Labor’s Lost

by William Shakespeare
directed by Amanda Dehnert

After I wrote my delayed review of Manahatta last month I was ready to post my season ratings for the excellent 2018 OSF season. I lined up all my reviews, added in the Romeo and Juliet we didn’t see because of smoke, and set about to rank the plays.

I got to 10. But, there were 11 productions this year. I initially thought I mistagged a review in the blog, so I searched though my posts.  Nope. Only 9 plays plus R&J.

I went to the OSF site and looked over the season’s production.

Oh.

I completely left out — and had forgotten about — Love’s Labor’s Lost.

Love's Labor's Lost ensemble from the 2018 Oregon Shakespeare Festival.

Ensemble.
Photo by Jenny Graham.

Once I saw the production’s name, I remembered that it was a fun evening. Lots of music. Accessible. Made sense.

And, apparently, completely forgettable as a theater piece.

Love's Labor's Lost singer from Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Jennie Greenberry, Royer Bockus, Alex Magni.
Photo by Jenny Graham.

OSF did an excellent job entertaining the audience with LLL. The characters were clear and there were moments of satisfying singing and frolicking.

This production treats Shakespeare’s story as a silly plot which can be used to showcase the comedic and musical talent of the cast. The very skilled OSF crew does an excellent job amusing the audience. LLL was innovative, sharp, and completely satisfying.

I can remember the antics and the music. I enjoyed them thoroughly. I even recall much of the show, especially when I look at the OSF publicity shots online.

Daniel Ostling’s set in the Elizabethan theater was engaging, simple-looking, and intricate. It helped the characters strut their stuff and touch the audience.

The music composed by Andre J. Pluess (also the sound designer) and Amanda Dehnert (also the director) enriched the experience and flawlessly fit into the flow of the festivities.

Acting and crafts deserve applause and thanks!

Was OSF right in treating LLL as vehicle for pure pleasure? Probably.

Will I remember the show as a life-changing work of art? Definitely not.

Play rating:
Play Rating 3 out of 5 Syntaxes

By |2018-10-21T10:43:40-07:00October 21, 2018|osf, plays|0 Comments

“The Book of Will” at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Ashland, Oregon
at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival

Book of Will

by Lauren M. Gunderson
directed by Christopher Liam Moore 

“Masturbation is loads of fun,” sing Romanovsky and Phillips, and the Book of Will is loads of fun. It’s a truly enjoyable evening for theater aficionados and Shakespeare cognoscente. Excellent fun. Self-indulgent, self-centered, masturbatory theater fun.

The “play” is a cover to allow extremely fine actors to deliver some of the best lines of Shakespeare, one after another, from productions unrelated except that they share an author.

Kate Hurster, David Kelly, Kevin Kenerly, Jeffrey King. Photo by Jenny Graham.

Kate Hurster, David Kelly, Kevin Kenerly, Jeffrey King. Photo by Jenny Graham.

The Book of Will’s thin story that allows memorable speech to follow memorable speech — always superbly delivered, by the way — doesn’t really matter. If you need to track a plot, supposedly a bunch of actors from Shakespeare’s company are alarmed that the body of the Bard’s work hasn’t been preserved and they set out to gather the material for the First Folio.  They recite the great speeches and argue over the wording as they collect material for the folio. Or, something like that. Really, no one cares.

The performance is simply good, clean mental mastrubation for elite theater goers. I feel about The Book of Will the way I reacted to August, Osage Country. I felt privileged to experience a Master’s Class in acting as some of the best talent in theater take the spotlight for BIG scene after BIG scene.

The “playwright” for the Book of Will choose excellent scenes to showcase Will’s writing and the actors’ talent. And, make no mistake, the acting talent on stage is phenomenal.

Kevin Kenerly stands out for delivering the highest quality Shakespeare. He slipped most easily from his roles in the Book of Will (Burbage and Jaggard) into his Greatest Hits speeches. He managed to deliver the crowd-pleasing classics with restrained emotion that would have fit whatever play the excerpts were from. Really good scenes!

I also enjoyed Daniel T. Parker and his several characters (Barman 2, Dering, Bernardo). It was good to see him cast in parts where he was allowed to act and not just be the big fat guy on stage. He is talented!

Jonathan Luke Stevens was also given some real acting to do, even if in small roles (Marcus, Boy Hamlet, Crier, and Horatio). Good to see him is something other than comic relief.

Of course, being Ashland, almost all of the cast was terrific.

The play ends on a high note with an emotionally charged technical tour de force: a video montage that shows some of the actors on stage in their earlier Shakespeare performances at OSF. The video also highlights some deceased legendary Ashland stars in their best Shakespeare roles. The tug on the heartstrings is effective.

After a couple hours of hearing the great in great roles with great speeches, the First Folio is printed and the Book of Will is over. You will feel well entertained and happy to have seen the production.

Play rating:
Play Rating 3 out of 5 Syntaxes

By |2018-09-09T06:34:03-07:00September 9, 2018|osf, plays|1 Comment
Go to Top